Forums
We have a senior comp requirement at DePauw. Students are given a paper from the primary literature (any field of chemistry is fair game but it usually depends on the organizing faculty member's area of expertise), and they are given two weeks to digest it. They work together to understand it, and go ask questions of faculty members. Then the faculty as a group write a 3 hour exam on the paper dealing with all kinds of different areas of chemistry--everything from "explain how a XXX spectroscopy works" to "prove that the yield is calculated correctly in this paper," to interpretations of paper data and equation derivations. Does anyone else do a version of comprehensive exams or cumulative exams as part of a major requirement at their institution, and if so, what kind of format does it have?
--Hilary
--Hilary
I think it would be great to require this of our students, but we do not.
When I was at Oberlin, honors students had to take an oral exam. It was mostly thesis defense, but they extended the discussion (from what I recall; I was terrified) to whatever they want.
At Reed, there is an institution-wide requirement that all students must pass a Junior Qualifying Exam in their major before they are eligible for to register for Senior Thesis.
In most departments, this is a written exam. In Chemistry, we have decided to base our Junior Qual on papers from the literature. The qual takes place over 4 days (Thurs - Sun) late in the spring semester of the Junior year. Students sign up for their choice of either 2 papers in one of the four subfields (Organic, Inorganic, Physical, or Biochem) or 1 paper in each of 2 subfields. Once we have the list, the faculty find individual papers for each student that has signed up in our field. So, for example, I find papers for any student that signs up for an Inorganic paper. The students pick up their 2 papers on Thursday at noon. They have 24 hours to read the 2 papers and choose the one that they want their exam to be based on. They then hole up in the library and learn everything they can about that paper. We give each student an oral exam on Sunday (typically 30-45 minutes long) in front of 2 faculty members. Sometimes, students may be asked to follow up this oral exam with a written component.
Students usually base their choice for the qual on which subject they feel the most confident in, based on coursework completed at that point. There is no formal connection to the subject of their qual and their senior thesis work, although we usually find the qual to be a reasonable predictor for where a student's primary interests lie. In some cases, often due to a "late start" in the major, students delay their Junior Qual Exam until right before the start of their senior year.
In general, we learn a lot about our students through this process, and it is particularly helpful for future thesis advisors.
I wish we had something like this at JMU. Personally, I think an oral exam is a great way to hold students accountable for their learning and provide us with feedback on retention across the curriculum.
This year we are supposed to be administering the DUCK (Diagnostic of Undergraduate Chemical Knowledge) put out by ACS Exams. (Supposedly because it was planned, but I don't know whether it's actually happening because I'm on sabbatical this year.) At one point we toyed with the idea of giving the standardized exam for chemistry graduates that is published by ETS.
As an undergrad at Princeton, we had comprehensive exams. I only vaguely remember this, but I'm pretty sure that we took 3 ACS exam. (We got to choose 3 out of 5 subjects - I think.) We were assigned a grade and this appeared on our transcript. At JMU, we give the ACS exams at the end of courses rather than at the end of the undergraduate career.