Forums
I'm trying to incorporate some computational chemistry into my upper-division Inorganic and grad level courses and wondering which would be better. Currently we don't do any computational in the department (shame shame!) and I'm trying to fix that by incorporating into the 400-level lab and lectures as well as our graduate level advanced inorganic course. Since I know little about either software I'd like to get a feel for what others like and don't like about each program, costs to students and departments, ease of use and learning, etc.
As near as I can tell, they both do the same thing. They have different interfaces, but to the casual user, they are probably identical.
I use Gaussian because a) we have a site licence and b) my computational colleague and collaborator uses it, so I can ask him if (when) I have questions.
I'm sure a computational chemist could come up with all sorts of reasons why one is better than the other. But there are two computational chemists in Claremont, and (if I recall correctly) one uses Spartan and the other Gaussian.
Adam
You could also try looking into GAMESS - it is free of charge and is a very powerful program.
http://www.msg.chem.iastate.edu/gamess/
It is very easy to build input files using free molecular modeling programs such as:
MacMolPlt (free of charge)
https://brettbode.github.io/wxmacmolplt/MacMolPlt_Manual.html
and Avogadro (free of charge)
http://avogadro.openmolecules.net/wiki/Main_Page
Thank you for all the input. I think the choice has been made for me unfortunately (or fortunately). The Pchem prof here wants Gaussian and has convinced everyone (including myself) that its more useful for research and teaching and we should use it. So if we can get the funding for the site license I think we are going that route in the near future.
My intention in using computational in inorganic is to introduce students to MO calculations. I might be able to use it for research also at some point, so that will be a plus.