Being a VIPEr fellow allows me the unique opportunity to share and reflect about the best practices in active and engaged learning. I do this on my own for the most part, but the Fellows workshops helps me to do this more thoughtfully and efficiently. I can trust the IONiC/VIPEr community to give me honest feedback and ideas about teaching so that I can implement them in my classes more successfully. Last year (Fall 2018), I started to implement one literature discussion in my course. It was successful considering that it was the first attempt; however, it was an isolated learning exercise. The students could have benefited from some closing questions or reflections. It also needed some further assessment. By engaging students verbally in the literature discussion, I gained a sense of what they learned, but did not have a firm grasp of what they learned. It needed some assessment! While attending the VIPEr Fellow workshop, I listened to presentations about literature discussions and assessments. With these new insights (and time during the workshop!), I was able to design an assessment for my XRD literature discussion AND write a new literature discussion with exam questions on the topic of lanthanide contraction.
I already alluded to the precious resource of a inorganic chemistry teaching community. I cannot stress enough the value of this human resource. This community is helpful and open to new ideas. The diversity in teaching styles, class sizes, expertise, etc. is a treasure!
I hope you share your XRD literature discussion! I would like to include more about the f-block in my course, and I know we would all benefit from your expertise.
Agreed! I am also interested in hearing more about the XRD discussion. I have spent a few days on X-ray diffraction in my advanced course, and though we all have a great time, it is a little overwhelming for the students. Anchoring the discussion in a literature piece sounds like a great way to give the students a sense of meaning for some complex ideas.